The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits employers from discriminating against applicants and employees who are 40 years of age or older because of age. As a result, when an employer treats an employee d differently because of his or her age, then the wronged party can file a claim for damages. If you were terminated from employment, or not hired, or were otherwise subjected to an adverse employment action because of your age, it is important to speak with an experienced San Francisco age discrimination attorney who can explain your legal options.
The Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA) prohibits employers with 20 or more employees from treating applicants or employees who are 40 years of age or older unfavorably because of age. Like federal laws prohibiting discrimination based on race, gender, and religion, the ADEA bars discrimination based on age in any aspect of employment, which includes not only hiring and firing but also job assignments and promotions. In addition, an employment practice or policy that applies to everyone may still be unlawful, if it is not based on a legitimate business reason other than age and disproportionately or negatively impacts older employees.
When it comes to advertising and recruiting, employers cannot include age-related preferences, specifications, or limitations in job notices. The only time that an advertisement can specify an age limit is when the employer can prove that age is a bona fide occupational qualification that relates to an essential job duty and is reasonably necessary to the normal operation of the company.
In 1990, Congress amended the ADEA to specifically prohibit employers from denying benefits to employees who are over 40 years of age, even though the cost of providing benefits to older employees is often greater than the cost of providing the same benefits to younger employees. In certain situations, however, an employer can reduce certain benefits based on age, but only if the cost the employer incurs to provide those benefits to older workers is no less than the cost that would be incurred to provide the same benefits to younger employees.
Harassment based on age can take a number of different forms, including offensive or derogatory remarks about someone’s age. While these comments may be indicative of age discrimination. simple teasing, isolated incidents, or offhand comments that are not serious do not always rise to the level of harassment under the law. Instead, courts focus on cases where harassment has become so frequent or severe that it:
Under federal law, this type of conduct is unlawful regardless of whether the alleged harasser is a person’s supervisor, a co-worker, or a third-party vendor or client.
To speak with an experienced San Francisco age discrimination attorney about your own case, please call Minnis & Smallets, LLP at 415-551-0885 or complete one of our brief online contact forms.
If you are looking for advice or representation, please contact us today using the form below and we will promptly respond to your inquiry.
Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing certain contact information herein, you are expressly authorizing the recipient of this message to contact you via the methods of communication provided.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.