Workers must be able to assert their legal rights without facing unlawful retaliation from their employers. Unfortunately, workplace retaliation remains a serious problem in California and across the United States. In fact, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) notes that retaliation is asserted as a cause of action in nearly half of federal employment claims.
Under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, retaliation occurs when an employee faces adverse action because he or she has opposed an unlawful employment practice. In practice, retaliation includes everything from being terminated for reporting racial discrimination to being denied a promotion for previously filing a sexual harassment claim.
While there are some wrongful termination cases in which employers all but outright admit to retaliating against a worker, these types of claims are often far more complicated. Plaintiffs should be prepared for an employer coming up with a pretextual reason to take adverse action against them.
Consider an example in which an employee reports that she was sexually harassed by her supervisor. Several months later, she is demoted and eventually she is fired from her position. If she brings a wrongful termination claim, the company is likely to respond by claiming that her sexual harassment report was wholly unrelated to the action it took against her. Instead, she was fired for “performance reasons.”
In this hypothetical situation, the timing of termination is highly suspicious. It is a textbook example that demonstrates the importance of a legal concept called ‘temporal proximity.’ Temporal proximity is the closeness in time of two issues — the protected activity (the reporting of sexual harassment) and adverse employment action (demotion and termination).
Temporal proximity is a form of evidence. By itself, it is generally not sufficient to prove and that retaliation occurred. However, it can be enough to warrant a strong inference of a causal connection between the protected activity and the adverse employment action. From there, a deeper investigation of any suspected retaliation or wrongful termination claim is required. Suspicious timing by an employer warrants a careful and thorough examination.
At Minnis & Smallets, LLP, our San Francisco employment lawyers have a successful history of representing employees in wrongful termination claims. If you or your loved one suffered unlawful retaliation from an employer, we are here to help. To set up a strictly confidential review of your case, please do not hesitate to contact us today. With an office in San Francisco, we serve communities throughout the Bay Area.
If you are looking for advice or representation, please contact us today using the form below and we will promptly respond to your inquiry.
Attorney Advertising. This information is designed for general information only. The information presented should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship. Past results and testimonials are not a guarantee, warranty, or prediction of the outcome of your case, and should not be construed as such. Past results cannot guarantee future performance. Any result in a single case is not meant to create an expectation of similar results in future matters because each case involves many different factors, therefore, results will differ on a case-by-case basis. By providing certain contact information herein, you are expressly authorizing the recipient of this message to contact you via the methods of communication provided.
How did we do?
Note: Your review may be shared publicly.